- Help
- Google+
Amazon just announced a change to its Wish List policies: On March 25, the retailer will remove the option to restrict purchases from third-party sellers for list items. Gift purchasers will be able to buy items sold by third parties on people's lists, and their addresses will be shared with the seller for fulfillment.
Creators like Zach Bussey shared a screenshot of the Amazon email on X.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed."When gifts are purchased from your shared or public lists, Amazon needs to provide your shipping address to sellers and delivery partners to fulfill these orders," the email notes. "During the delivery process, your address may become visible to gift purchasers through delivery updates and tracking information."
That isn't new. If a customer has a public list and connects an address to their list in the settings, gift purchasers may receive the customer's address through the seller and delivery partners fulfilling these orders as they share delivery updates and tracking information. The change is that customers will no longer have the option to restrict purchases from third-party sellers on their Lists as of March 25.
SEE ALSO: Amazon shuts down Blue Jay warehouse robot project after less than a year How to take precautionsAmazon recommends using a P.O. Box or non-residential addresses for lists shared with the public.
You can also adjust your list privacy to Private or Shared (the latter option specifies who can see the lists) to limit who has access.
You can also remove your shipping address by tapping the "Shipping Address" field and selecting "None." Ostensibly, the gift buyer would then need to directly contact the Wish List owner to obtain shipping information.
Creators of all kinds, from Twitch streamers to sex workers, use Amazon Wish Lists to receive gifts from their fans. At least one "PSA" is recommending creators "don't get doxxed" and move their lists to Throne, a wishlist platform. On Throne's home page, it says that, "All the creator and fan information stays private and is not shared between parties."
When Anthropic launched years ago, the company wanted an industry-wide "race to the top" in artificial intelligence, instead of a race to the bottom in pursuit of customers and market dominance that would inadvertently lead to catastrophic safety risks.
So Anthropic adopted safety principles and policies that it hoped it competitors would also implement. In some instances, companies, including Google and OpenAI, did, according to Anthropic. Still, Anthropic's hopes didn't "pan out" as the company hoped, according to a blog post it published Tuesday.
The post announced that Anthropic, the maker of the AI chatbot Claude, is altering key safety practices to meet what it views as present-day challenges.
SEE ALSO: Claude apps: How Anthropic will integrate Slack, Canva, and moreSpecifically, Anthropic will no longer automatically pause model development if it could be considered dangerous; instead, it will consider its competitors' actions and whether they release models with similar capabilities. Previously, Anthropic committed to safeguards that would reduce its models' absolute risk, regardless of whether other AI developers did the same.
"The policy environment has shifted toward prioritizing AI competitiveness and economic growth, while safety-oriented discussions have yet to gain meaningful traction at the federal level," the company wrote. "We remain convinced that effective government engagement on AI safety is both necessary and achievable, and we aim to continue advancing a conversation grounded in evidence, national security interests, economic competitiveness, and public trust. But this is proving to be a long-term project—not something that is happening organically as AI becomes more capable or crosses certain thresholds."
Though Anthropic said it aims to continue leading on safety, its latest decision reflects the breakneck speed at which competitors are releasing new models.
Anthropic has also been under intense pressure this week by the U.S. Defense Department, which is pressing the company to allow the military to use its AI tools for any purpose, including mass surveillance or the deployment of autonomous weapons without human oversight.
Anthropic has yet to relent on those points in contract negotiations with the Defense Department, reportedly stirring the ire of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who threatened to sever the company's relationship with the military, Axios reports.
Anthropic has participated in an AI pilot program for military-related imagery analysis, along with Google, OpenAI, and xAI, according to the New York Times. Though Claude has been the only chatbot working on the government's classified systems, a Pentagon official said Anthropic could be replaced by another firm.
Disclosure: Ziff Davis, Mashable’s parent company, in April 2025 filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.
TL;DR: Grab Microsoft Windows 11 Pro for only $12.97 (reg. $199) while this deal lasts.
Opens in a new window Credit: Microsoft Microsoft Windows 11 Pro $12.97Ready for a faster, more seamless computing experience? Microsoft’s latest operating system delivers exactly that — and Windows 11 Pro is available for just $12.97 (reg. $199) for a limited time. That’s a lifetime license for less than the price of a movie ticket.
Windows 11 Pro comes loaded with a sleek, streamlined interface, improved multitasking tools like Snap Layouts, and enhanced security features, including TPM 2.0, BitLocker, and Smart App Control. It’s built for professionals, creatives, and everyday users alike. Gamers will also appreciate support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, delivering ultra-realistic graphics.
Mashable Deals Be the first to know! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Get editor selected deals texted right to your phone! Loading... Sign Me Up By signing up, you agree to receive recurring automated SMS marketing messages from Mashable Deals at the number provided. Msg and data rates may apply. Up to 2 messages/day. Reply STOP to opt out, HELP for help. Consent is not a condition of purchase. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. Thanks for signing up!But the real game-changer is Copilot. This built-in AI assistant helps you work faster by summarizing web pages, generating text or images, opening apps, adjusting settings, or even suggesting code — all without leaving your workflow.
What you’ll get out of this deal:
Lifetime license for just $12.97
Windows 10 is being phased out
Built-in AI assistant Copilot for smarter daily productivity
Advanced security and pro-level tools
Seamless design optimized for multitasking and collaboration
Supports Microsoft Teams, Widgets, and touch-enabled devices
Don’t wait too long to get a lifetime Windows 11 Pro license for $12.97 (reg. $199).
StackSocial prices subject to change.
While some porn performers are out there making six figures a year — or month — many don't. In 2024, it was revealed that the average OnlyFans creator pocketed just $1,300 a year. But that sum was a calculation based on OnlyFans' numbers. What do actual 18+ creators say they earn?
The average creator earns about $58,700 a year from adult work, or about $5,000 per month, according to a survey from adult industry research firm SWR Data.
SEE ALSO: How I make six figures on OnlyFans without taking my clothes offSWR Data conducted the State of the Creator survey in fall 2025, which included over 550 adult creators. It found that just 35 percent of creators said they were entirely dependent on their adult work for their survival, while 51 percent said they earn income outside the adult industry.
Newer creators earn around $16,000 annually on average, while that number shoots up to $74,000 for those who've been in the industry for five years or more. And for creators who've both been in the industry for 5+ years and only work in adult, the average income is more than $111,000, according to SWR Data.
"While many factors influence who earns how much...one factor correlates with higher incomes more than anything else: the amount of time spent in the industry," SWR Data wrote in a Substack post.
More research is to be done about the earnings of adult stars — but SWR Data's Substack stressed that the top one percent certainly doesn't speak for everyone.